Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Enterprise Resource Planning & Manufacturing
Lawson S3 Procurement
Electronic Receipts with Perpetual Inventory
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
chaoticist
Past 24 Hours:
2
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5185
People Online:
Visitors:
229
Members:
0
Total:
229
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson Landmark
LPL INSTR Functions
4/5/2024 8:32 PM
I'm writing a simple report using the Create R
Infor SCM
Translating 856 to get the ~ REF^CN^ field
4/3/2024 8:24 PM
We are trying to get the tracking number which is
IPA/ProcessFlow
Sample XML file create Flow
4/3/2024 3:43 PM
Hello everyone, I am new to creating XML files
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
bn105 error message
3/26/2024 6:40 PM
I need to change some of the set ups in our Life I
IPA/ProcessFlow
IPA executing Job
3/13/2024 7:08 PM
New to the IPA world and was wondering, can an IPA
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Life Age Reduction on benefits plans
3/12/2024 7:15 PM
For our optional life we have an age based coverag
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
BN53.1 Add-In
3/7/2024 3:31 PM
We are migrating to Solstice. They require a
Lawson Business Intelligence/Reporting/Crystal
Domain Name Change
3/5/2024 7:45 PM
Our domain name needs to change and was hoping I c
S3 Customization/Development
Cobol calling Shell Script
2/29/2024 1:27 PM
Has anyone created or modified a Lawson Cobol prog
Infor ION
ION vs IPA
2/29/2024 1:24 AM
We had a person new to Lawson and Infor go to Info
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3288
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1348
Roger French
1311
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Unanswered
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Lawson S3 Procurement
Electronic Receipts with Perpetual Inventory
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
TBonney
Veteran Member
Posts: 277
8/26/2009 5:20 PM
Does anyone (that does not use JIT) process receipts electronically through MA531, prior to running invoice matching through MA540?
We have looked into receiving receipts electronically to reduce the number of "no receipt" errors when running the MA540. However, our fear is that since we use "perpetual" inventory (cycle count processing), this can't really be done. If we process the receipts prior to the inventory being physically received, the QOH in the system will be unreliable.
We do not use Just in Time and we deal with dozens, if not hundreds, of different vendors. The only folks we've talked to that receive their receipts electronically use JIT and only deal with one main vendor.
Thank you!
Bill Ianni
Veteran Member
Posts: 111
8/27/2009 5:32 AM
Have you tried the "No Receipt" Workflow service which comes delivered with Procurement? Perhaps this could resolve the problem? The service is triggered after X days of a "no receipt" condition; driven by MA01 setup. Seems more plausible than MA531.
Bill Ianni
Veteran Member
Posts: 111
8/27/2009 5:32 AM
Have you tried the "No Receipt" Workflow service which comes delivered with Procurement? Perhaps this could resolve the problem? The service is triggered after X days of a "no receipt" condition; driven by MA01 setup. Seems more plausible than MA531.
TBonney
Veteran Member
Posts: 277
8/28/2009 5:09 PM
Thank you Bill. I do not believe our procurement folks have looked into this option. I will bring it to their attention and have them research it a bit more. Thank you.
TBonney
Veteran Member
Posts: 277
9/1/2009 2:07 PM
Bill,
Please advise if you can provide any additional information on the "No Receipt" workflow. We do not presently use process flow. (We have begun to build a few flows, but none are yet live in production.) Is this MA01 field only used by process Flow, or would using it prevent these "no receipts" errors from displaying for the designated number of days when they attempt to do their matching too?
Thank you.
Bill Ianni
Veteran Member
Posts: 111
9/17/2009 3:04 PM
The field on MA01 is a Workflow field so a process flow is not needed. This service creates MA64 messages that buyers would need to respond to. Messages are created for invoices in the MA60 Reconciliation Queue when the number of days w/o a receipt exceeds the number of days setting on MA01.
TBonney
Veteran Member
Posts: 277
9/21/2009 6:02 PM
Bill,
Thank you for your update! I misunderstood the form/field help on the MA01. I thought it was saying it was useful only in processing through Process Flow. I will pass this infor along to our procurement folks for testing...Thanks again...
Cameron
Basic Member
Posts: 8
10/1/2009 11:44 AM
Hi-
We are using MA531 with one of our vendors with success.. However, we are doing about 70% of our total stock business with this vendor, so that makes difference I'm sure.
The MA531 works fine, but you do have to have someone watch over the process beccause of problems that can arise.. Say a vendor subs an item or the vendor part number changes, then the receipt will fail if your PO is not corrected to reflect this prior to the MA531 being run. I do know that you can work the error messages and re-process those receipts, but we aren't doing that..
The way our process works is that the 856 comes in at about 3:00am.. the goods arrive at 5:00am, and are being put away by the time our 1st shift comes on.. at 7:00am the MA531 runs and updates the inventory.. It works for us because we do not have users ordering things 24/7.
gawalsh
New Member
Posts: 1
10/1/2009 12:26 PM
We run the MA531 receipt job prior to the MA540 Invoice job daily. We have been receiving the EDI 856 TX for years from our primary vendor for our warehouse and our JIT orders. Our warehouse management has scheduled days they create a Bulk order and make sure the items are put away on the day they are going to do a cycle count. This ensures the SOH is accurate. I have found that there are only a few vendors who actually are sent up to send the EDI 856 TX.
You are not authorized to post a reply.