UG11.1

Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
Kevin Hagan
Advanced Member
Posts: 30
Advanced Member
    We are in the process of upgrading to 9.0, and have encountered the required UG11.1 fields. I was looking to see what everyone has benn populating in these fields and if they are keeping naming conventions identical to coding in the HR tables for names and descriptions
    John Henley
    Senior Member
    Posts: 3348
    Senior Member
      Kevin, that's actually a good idea (keeping the coding same between HR / AC). I'd also suggest if you're using new LSF9 security and have similar security roles that you make those names match as well.
      Thanks for using the LawsonGuru.com forums!
      John
      You are not authorized to post a reply.