Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Integration / Customization
S3 Customization/Development
4GL Report missing Company Name
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
TomV
Past 24 Hours:
1
Prev. 24 Hours:
2
Overall:
5186
People Online:
Visitors:
155
Members:
0
Total:
155
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson Landmark
LPL INSTR Functions
4/5/2024 8:32 PM
I'm writing a simple report using the Create R
Infor SCM
Translating 856 to get the ~ REF^CN^ field
4/3/2024 8:24 PM
We are trying to get the tracking number which is
IPA/ProcessFlow
Sample XML file create Flow
4/3/2024 3:43 PM
Hello everyone, I am new to creating XML files
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
bn105 error message
3/26/2024 6:40 PM
I need to change some of the set ups in our Life I
IPA/ProcessFlow
IPA executing Job
3/13/2024 7:08 PM
New to the IPA world and was wondering, can an IPA
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Life Age Reduction on benefits plans
3/12/2024 7:15 PM
For our optional life we have an age based coverag
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
BN53.1 Add-In
3/7/2024 3:31 PM
We are migrating to Solstice. They require a
Lawson Business Intelligence/Reporting/Crystal
Domain Name Change
3/5/2024 7:45 PM
Our domain name needs to change and was hoping I c
S3 Customization/Development
Cobol calling Shell Script
2/29/2024 1:27 PM
Has anyone created or modified a Lawson Cobol prog
Infor ION
ION vs IPA
2/29/2024 1:24 AM
We had a person new to Lawson and Infor go to Info
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3288
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1348
Roger French
1311
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Unanswered
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
S3 Customization/Development
4GL Report missing Company Name
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
Demi
Veteran Member
Posts: 67
8/11/2015 7:38 PM
I have a custom 4GL program that has been migrated over into a new version 10 environment. When performing a parallel comparison, the new 10 version is not listing the Company Name in the job submission parameters section. I've tried running a new rptgen; but that hasn't helped. Any suggestions would be appreciated......
Ragu Raghavan
Veteran Member
Posts: 468
8/11/2015 9:48 PM
Rules in the .sr file control how some of the screen fields work. Maybe you had a custom rule that did not get moved ?
Demi
Veteran Member
Posts: 67
8/12/2015 4:23 PM
Thanks for your pointer. I verified the .sr files and they look compatable. My issue is quite strange - it is only affecting a few of our custom 4GLs, not all of them. I tried a recompile. Tried a rptgen and even a scrgen. I even went so far as to migrate the version back into the system. So far nothing has helped. I guess I should have stated that last point earlier in my description - it is a migrated custom from a different product line - not newly built within the product line. It's so weird, the company name does show up in the report heading of the same program; just not in the job submission parameters page (first page in our reports). I had to open a call with GSC.
Greg Moeller
Veteran Member
Posts: 1498
8/12/2015 4:30 PM
Have you made sure that all of the int files are gone, so they get regenerated? And then a lstinvk -q
rm $LAWDIR/prodline/int/*
rm $LAWDIR/prodline/*src/int/*
lstinvk -q prodline cutstom-pgm-name
then
qcompile prodline custom-pgm-name
Jeff Wardzala
Basic Member
Posts: 9
9/25/2015 1:25 PM
Are you saying the job submission parameters are not in the generated .prt file or are they also missing from the submit form itself (.scr file). Have you done an scrgen to create an SD file to see if it appears there?
Demi
Veteran Member
Posts: 67
9/29/2015 1:04 PM
Thanks Greg for your suggestions. I looked through all the intermediate libraries and everything looked fine. I then started back tracking in the system - I hate it when it only happens in one product line and the others are fine. I checked the Key Number definitions, and System Key Numbers; they looked fine too. It just felt off because some of the systemcode programs worked, while others didn't (customs and even a delivered PA340). Then I decided to recompile the form and object rules, just in case something quirky happened. Maybe something went astray between the application upgrades and the loading of the custom programs. It's now working! Thanks for the responses.
You are not authorized to post a reply.