Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Supply Chain Management
Lawson S3 Supply Chain
Combining Item Groups?
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
TomV
Past 24 Hours:
1
Prev. 24 Hours:
2
Overall:
5186
People Online:
Visitors:
267
Members:
0
Total:
267
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson Landmark
LPL INSTR Functions
4/5/2024 8:32 PM
I'm writing a simple report using the Create R
Infor SCM
Translating 856 to get the ~ REF^CN^ field
4/3/2024 8:24 PM
We are trying to get the tracking number which is
IPA/ProcessFlow
Sample XML file create Flow
4/3/2024 3:43 PM
Hello everyone, I am new to creating XML files
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
bn105 error message
3/26/2024 6:40 PM
I need to change some of the set ups in our Life I
IPA/ProcessFlow
IPA executing Job
3/13/2024 7:08 PM
New to the IPA world and was wondering, can an IPA
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Life Age Reduction on benefits plans
3/12/2024 7:15 PM
For our optional life we have an age based coverag
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
BN53.1 Add-In
3/7/2024 3:31 PM
We are migrating to Solstice. They require a
Lawson Business Intelligence/Reporting/Crystal
Domain Name Change
3/5/2024 7:45 PM
Our domain name needs to change and was hoping I c
S3 Customization/Development
Cobol calling Shell Script
2/29/2024 1:27 PM
Has anyone created or modified a Lawson Cobol prog
Infor ION
ION vs IPA
2/29/2024 1:24 AM
We had a person new to Lawson and Infor go to Info
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3288
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1348
Roger French
1311
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Unanswered
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Lawson S3 Supply Chain
Combining Item Groups?
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
chadC
Basic Member
Posts: 9
9/21/2010 8:40 PM
We have 5 IC companies (1 of which is a Canadian company). Each has it's own Item Group. We are looking into combining those 5 into 1 Item Group (either by keeping an existing one or creating a brand new one). We are hoping to correspond this with the v9.0.1 upgrade this winter (from v8.1.0). Does anyone have any thoughts to any ramifications this could have with PO, MA or AP?
Adam Jacobson
Veteran Member
Posts: 69
9/22/2010 11:00 AM
The key question: Do your item numbers overlap and represent different things:
For example:
If Item 12345 in Item Group/Company 1 - Paper Towel holders
and Item 12345 in Item Group/Company 2 - X Ray film
your going to have issues
Similarly, you need to think of any setup you have tied to IC11 - e.g. UOMs. Even if the item is the same in both company 1and company 2, this may cause issues.
chadC
Basic Member
Posts: 9
9/22/2010 1:40 PM
Thank you for the response Adam. We are definitely going to have overlapping Item Numbers and UOM's. Decisions are going to have to be made on those, and other things like: # of Decimals, Auto Document Numbering, etc. However, no one here seems to believe that those are the reasons for the separate Item Groups in the first place.
The thoughts are that since each company also has its own Vendor Group and Pay Group, they had to set up IC with individual Item Groups. I can't seem to find a reason that would be the case. So I'm wondering what I am missing here?
Adam Jacobson
Veteran Member
Posts: 69
9/22/2010 2:58 PM
I don't think your missing anything.
I write (or used to write) dozens of queries over Lawson data.
And I can see no way where item group needs to align with Vendor group.
I could be missing something but I have a lot of years with the data.
True - your kind of consolidation doesn't come along often but I can't see a problem other then the overlapping numbers (which is going to make converting your PO Line records just an absolute joy.
chadC
Basic Member
Posts: 9
9/22/2010 5:14 PM
Thanks again for your insight Adam, I appreciate it. It'll be a huge project, that's for sure.
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1162
11/4/2010 11:34 AM
We only have one item group and one vendor group for multiple companies. I'm wondering how PO13 works with multiple vendor groups. I don't envy you in this project.
chadC
Basic Member
Posts: 9
11/4/2010 2:14 PM
Hi Jon, thanks for the message. Yes, PO13 is probably a big reason why we are not going to do this now: After additional research and testing, I have found that PO00.1 Procurement Group will not allow you to use one Item Group on multiple Procurement Groups (which we have - and do not plan on changing that). Therefore, this project has been put on the back burner for now (sigh of relief).
You are not authorized to post a reply.