Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Supply Chain Management
Lawson S3 Supply Chain
Order of operation for items
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
NonnieBear1776
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
1
Overall:
5161
People Online:
Visitors:
217
Members:
0
Total:
217
Online Now:
New Topics
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3288
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1348
Roger French
1311
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Unanswered
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Lawson S3 Supply Chain
Order of operation for items
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
Bev Edwards
Veteran Member
Posts: 366
6/16/2014 4:37 PM
I understand that if you inactivate an item in PO13.3, it automatically places a hold on the item in PO25.6.
Does it matter if you follow this order OR is ok to place the hold on the item in PO25.6 first w/o going to PO13.3??
sfrench
Basic Member
Posts: 11
6/16/2014 4:52 PM
It does not matter which you do first, but if you only put the item on hold in PO25.6 it will not inactivate the PO13.3 record. If you do the inactivation in PO13.3 first it just saves you a step on the PO25.6 line by putting it on hold at the same time.
Sara
sfrench
Basic Member
Posts: 11
6/16/2014 4:56 PM
Hi everyone BTW~ I am fairly new to posting but have been following for quite some time. I come with 10 years of Lawson Supply Chain experience (most of those in a MMIS analyst type position) and love this site! My name is Sara and I am the MMIS Systems Specialist for Childrens in Dallas. Looking for a network of people in my field for best practices and just somewhere to bounce scenarios I face off of people in the same situations!
Sara
The Alchemist
Advanced Member
Posts: 34
6/16/2014 5:11 PM
Hi one other benifit I like (and shamely just found out) is if you use "replacement" in PO13.3 it will update (change) the vendor number(s) under contract (PO25) for you. This not only saves time but keeps the lines in PO25.6 from growing.
Bev Edwards
Veteran Member
Posts: 366
6/16/2014 5:44 PM
What happens if an item is left active in PO13.3 after being placed on hold in PO25.6?
If someone forgets to do the inactivate step in PO13.3, does it cause any issues, other than perhaps inaccurate reporting?
Bev
sfrench
Basic Member
Posts: 11
6/16/2014 6:02 PM
I have found as long as the PO13 record that is correct is made the default vendor item; it does not cause any issues ordering, but it can become an issue of confusion with the Buyers if they are looking up a vendor item number. I still have a handful of items that are on on hold in PO25.6 but have more than one active PO13 vendor item and I am just cleaning them up as I catch them. It is something on my to-do list (when I have some free time, LOL) to run a query and just be done with them, but if they come up I make them inactive just to have a cleaner item master.
Bev Edwards
Veteran Member
Posts: 366
6/16/2014 6:08 PM
I'm running a query of items to compare what is active in PO13.3, but inactive in PO25.6.
What do the R Status codes mean in POVENITEM? I see '0' and '1'.
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1162
6/17/2014 12:35 PM
0 = Active
1 = Inactive
You are not authorized to post a reply.