Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Supply Chain Management
Lawson S3 Supply Chain
Requisition Commitments Do Not Relieve
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Jessica
Past 24 Hours:
2
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5164
People Online:
Visitors:
210
Members:
0
Total:
210
Online Now:
New Topics
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3288
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1348
Roger French
1311
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Unanswered
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Lawson S3 Supply Chain
Requisition Commitments Do Not Relieve
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
Mark Larochelle
Basic Member
Posts: 9
8/19/2010 11:03 AM
Here in the State of NH, we are running Lawson 9.01, MSP 3 Financials, Procurement, Grants and Activities. Has anyone ever experienced the GL94 commitment NOT getting relieved after it has been encumbered into a purchase order from PO23? Of courese, what happens in this situation, is that the total obligation is overstated. We use budget edits at the account summary level. Thanks a million for any response to this post.
Jimmy Chiu
Veteran Member
Posts: 641
8/19/2010 2:41 PM
Commitment not relieved in 9.0.1 Applications
Article ID:5407305
Description:
Several invoices have been processed for an existing Purchase Order but the General Ledger commitment amount is not being relieved.
Resolution:
We found there was an issue with the data coming from a prior version of applications in regards to Service By Amount Purchase Orders.
If you find this circumstance please log a support case with SCM Supply Chain Management to make sure you get it correctly fixed.
Not sure if this apply to you. I would open a CASE.
You are not authorized to post a reply.