Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Infor / Lawson Platforms
S3 Security
online only users
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Pramod Chandra
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5243
People Online:
Visitors:
201
Members:
0
Total:
201
Online Now:
New Topics
S3 Systems Administration
Lawson Security Admin (LSA) - Securing Print Manager to self only
10/24/2025 6:27 PM
Looking for someone who would be willing to share
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
Lawson Add-in
9/30/2025 6:51 PM
I am looking for a Lawson Add-ins query to add new
Lawson S3 Procurement
Anyone getting PO 0000 not found for company error in PO23?
9/30/2025 2:45 AM
Anyone getting PO 0000 not found for company error
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
PO20 - Cancel PO via Add-in
9/25/2025 8:03 PM
Is it possible to cancel PO's using add-ins? I
S3 Systems Administration
S3 Payroll - PayStubs
9/18/2025 6:58 PM
Looking for a reliable solution to streamline the
S3 Systems Administration
Quick Access report
8/25/2025 7:17 PM
Looking for a good way to see who has access Lawso
S3 Customization/Development
LP01 hiding a PTO plan from the list
8/13/2025 4:44 PM
Hi all. is there a way to hide a specific PTO&n
Lawson Business Intelligence/Reporting/Crystal
GLTrans - PO Line/MAInvdtl
8/6/2025 6:13 PM
Hello, we have an existing tabular model for fina
IPA/ProcessFlow
Retrieving GUID from InforOS
7/25/2025 2:22 AM
Hello everyone, I was wondering if there is a way
IPA/ProcessFlow
IPA for forwarding cost messages (MA64/MA66.3)
7/23/2025 6:07 PM
When a buyer has an invoice cost message where the
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1377
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Chesca
1042
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Infor / Lawson Platforms
S3 Security
online only users
Please
login
to post a reply.
4 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
17 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
Sheila Kendall
New Member
Posts: 0
6/6/2011 1:53 PM
I am trying to use the LSF security for a very simple class - The users will only be able to access one form.
I thought that I would not have to set up a UNIX account if the users were to use Portal only and only an online form, but so far no luck. I get this that says "portal cannot load because the profile service returned an error". ANy ideas where to start looking?
Kwane McNeal
Veteran Member
Posts: 479
6/6/2011 2:14 PM
Split
Sheila,
It depends on the form. If it is a batch form, you will need to setup an underlying OS account.
There are a few online forms that also need an underlying OS account.
In either case, without seeing your setup, I'm making broad assumptions. With that understanding, the following are ideas that come to mind:
1) ALL users need some level of access to LOGAN and GEN. You will need to set that up explicitly for an LS-only user.
2) ALL users need access to a form's (TKN object) containers, such as PDL, CAT, and PGM objects.
3) When I have been "Portal cannot load" it is usually a global issue, and in that is a configuration issue. Unless you are sure someone can log into Portal without error, that is something that should be reviewed.
Goober
Basic Member
Posts: 17
6/6/2011 6:00 PM
Split
I'm comming at this from an Iseries point of view. In our situation all users that have access via portal must have a Iseries/UNIX account and their SSO ID of course. Our ESS users share that same Iseries/Unix account because of their limit access. But still they need that account.
Hope this helps.
Greg Moeller
Veteran Member
Posts: 1498
6/6/2011 7:40 PM
Split
You being in "Education" and me being in "Heatlhcare" maybe the same 'everyone moves around, has different jobs depending on the day' situation may not exist.
We've made the decision to give EVERYONE here an underlying Unix account.. That way our LS Sub-Administrators can control the access whether batch, or ESS only, simply by assigning groups.
Sheila Kendall
New Member
Posts: 0
6/14/2011 3:33 PM
Split
Thank you everyone. It ended up being that I had not entered the product line on the environment form.
The suggestion of creating UNIX accounts for everyone, though, to keep it simple for the adminstrators is a very good point. I think I will do that otherwise, it will become to hard to manage.
Thanks again.
Please
login
to post a reply.