Who's On?

	Membership:
	Latest: sakkatan
	Past 24 Hours: 0
	Prev. 24 Hours: 0
	Overall: 5216

	People Online:
	Visitors: 34
	Members: 0
	Total: 34

Name	Points
Greg Moeller	4184
David Williams	3349
Kat V	2984
Woozy	1973
Jimmy Chiu	1883
Kwane McNeal	1437
Ragu Raghavan	1377
Roger French	1315
mark.cook	1244
Chesca	1042

UG11.1

1 Replies

0 Subscribed to this topic

44 Subscribed to this forum

Sort:

Author

Messages

Kevin Hagan

Advanced Member

Posts: 30

9/12/2007 11:53 AM

We are in the process of upgrading to 9.0, and have encountered the required UG11.1 fields. I was looking to see what everyone has benn populating in these fields and if they are keeping naming conventions identical to coding in the HR tables for names and descriptions

John Henley

Posts: 3364

New Poster

Engaged Reader

Avid Reader

9/12/2007 2:49 PM

Kevin, that's actually a good idea (keeping the coding same between HR / AC). I'd also suggest if you're using new LSF9 security and have similar security roles that you make those names match as well.