Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Human Capital Management
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Separate company or process levels in exisiting company?
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Julie
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5312
People Online:
Visitors:
459
Members:
0
Total:
459
Online Now:
New Topics
S3 Systems Administration
Quick Access report
8/25/2025 7:17 PM
Looking for a good way to see who has access Lawso
S3 Customization/Development
LP01 hiding a PTO plan from the list
8/13/2025 4:44 PM
Hi all. is there a way to hide a specific PTO&n
Lawson Business Intelligence/Reporting/Crystal
GLTrans - PO Line/MAInvdtl
8/6/2025 6:13 PM
Hello, we have an existing tabular model for fina
IPA/ProcessFlow
Retrieving GUID from InforOS
7/25/2025 2:22 AM
Hello everyone, I was wondering if there is a way
IPA/ProcessFlow
IPA for forwarding cost messages (MA64/MA66.3)
7/23/2025 6:07 PM
When a buyer has an invoice cost message where the
Lawson Portal
Lawson ESS customization
6/23/2025 10:28 AM
I want to add new links and customize the ESS (sel
S3 Security
Securing forms and programs that use Company Group
6/17/2025 5:41 PM
Is there a way to write a rule, that looks up a co
S3 Customization/Development
Self-Serve Customization and Modification of home page
6/17/2025 3:40 PM
Hi, I want to add new links and customize the E
S3 Customization/Development
Data / List view on Lawson Portal
5/21/2025 2:37 AM
Client is on S3 V10. All delivered and custom form
Lawson S3 Financials
Applying credits to open AP invoices
4/28/2025 1:26 PM
Hello, I am new to the Lawson system and after ru
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3290
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1377
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Human Capital Management
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Separate company or process levels in exisiting company?
Please
login
to post a reply.
4 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
68 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
abassett
New Member
Posts: 4
8/13/2010 4:47 PM
We are adding 4 small "companies" to our exisiting Lawson population. We were planning to set up 1 new company (because that has been the practice) with 4 process levels, but I wonder if that makes sense. All 4 of these new groups are actually part of the existing Company 1 organization and each has a separate tax id.
Any thoughts on pros/cons of creating/not creating a new company for this?
Thanks for any input!
John Henley
Posts: 3359
8/13/2010 6:22 PM
Split
moving to HR forum...
Deleted User
New Member
Posts: 0
8/16/2010 8:58 AM
Split
The answer depends on your own business practices - do you need to easily report all companies together? Although you can merge company data using Crystal, HR Writer, Add-Ins, etc., standard Lawson reports generally don't allow that. A bigger consideration - do your employees move between companies (term in one, get hired in the other), or work in both? If so, you'll be better served setting up process levels instead of companies. Except for a few codes, if you use multiple companies you'll need to set up positions, job codes, benefits, personnel actions, etc. etc. separately, which can be a maintenance nightmare. Since you can set up different tax IDs by PL, I've always been a fan of keeping one company instead of multiple ones.
abassett
New Member
Posts: 4
8/16/2010 12:47 PM
Split
Thanks so much Stephanie for your input - that is pretty much what I was thinking too.
John-thanks for getting my message to the right place.
MARCO3535
Advanced Member
Posts: 25
8/27/2010 6:13 PM
Split
Stephanie,
My thinking exactly. My previous employer had a 2 company setup- instead of 1 company and 2 P/L .
It was a reporting nightmare, as well as the inconsistencies in the dept code, pay codes, job codes, not to mention the headaches - when a current ee 'transfers' between companies - 'terming' in 1 company and 'hiring' into the other company.
Eventually, we went to a 1 company setup, some prep work, lots of testing, but definitely worth it.
Later
Marco3535
Please
login
to post a reply.