• Search Forums
    Advanced Search
Prev
Next
Forums Integration / Customization S3 Customization/Development

E@DBFINDnxt in LSF9

 3 Replies
 0 Subscribed to this topic
 18 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Author
Messages
Walter
Advanced Member
Posts: 22
Advanced Member
8/19/2010 4:14 PM
I'm in the process of migrating our custom programs from 8.1 to LSF9. The following is from one of those programs which has been working fine 8.1



C eval $FirstZAY = 'Y'

C callp DN@DBPXZAY1(E@DBFINDbegrng)
* Loop through Billing Header Records where status = 1

* If applicable, apply Process Lever and/or Voucher Number filters
C DOU dzay@notfound = TRUE or
C dzay@notfound = FALSE and
C (Dzaycmpny <> D@cmpny or
C Dzayvchnbr <> D@vchnbr)
C if $FirstZAY = 'N'
C callp DN@DBPXZAY1(E@DBFINDnxt)
C endif
C eval $FirstZAY = 'N'

Testing this in 9.0.1, the program crashes at DN@DBPXZAY1(E@DBFINDbegrng)
with the following error, which trying to read the second record

User Name: DSWK Job Name: PX120WK Queue Name: ACCLAWDEV
BEGIN: Job Submitted: Thu Aug 19 12:43:54 2010

Step 1: PX120 Started. . . . . .: Thu Aug 19 12:44:38 2010
** Creating .prt and .dtl files
File LAWAPP9/BINVOICEDT.
tsFindNxtDBRec error is File position not valid for nxt/prv find (114).
Process ID . . . . . . .: 156767
(StartJob) CALL PX120 Failed
Elapsed Time: 00:04:42

END: Job Ended: Thu Aug 19 12:48:36 2010

Does anyone know if these IO routines have changed in LSF9
Ragu Raghavan
Veteran Member
Posts: 477
Veteran Member
New Poster
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
Engaged Poster
Engaged Poster
Wow, you're on a roll!
Avid Poster
Avid Poster
Seriously, you're a posting maniac!
Engaged Reader
Engaged Reader
You are an engaged reader!
Avid Reader
Avid Reader
Avid Reader art thou!
8/19/2010 4:35 PM
They did change in the Unix/Wndows env.

Prior to LSF9, it was forgving. I could pair a FIND-BEGRNG with a FIND-NEXT.
Now it forces me to match FIND-BEGRNG with FIND-NXTRNG.

This looks like I-series/RPG. Don't know the syntax. You probably need to replace the callp DN@DBPXZAY1(E@DBFINDnxt) with a callp DN@DBPXZAY1(E@DBFINDnxtrng) or something.
Walter
Advanced Member
Posts: 22
Advanced Member
8/19/2010 5:04 PM
Thanks. That's what I was suspecting. I'll give your suggestion a try and let you know how it works

Your right in that is iSeries RPG and I wouldn't be at all surprised if it were changed too.
Walter
Advanced Member
Posts: 22
Advanced Member
8/19/2010 7:01 PM
Looks like that worked. I paired up E@DBLOCKBEGRNG with E@DBLOCKNXTRNG; also E@DBFINDBEGRNG with E@DBFINDNXTRNG

Program ran to normal completion and the results look good.

Thanks for your help. The solution was not nearly as bad as I initially thought.