Ok,
So the company I now work fore is currently on lawson 9, and have their main admin user (Lawson) set with LAUA.
The company is working on going to lawson 10 soon, and of course LAUA no longer works, so they are in the process of setting up a LS user test account that is granted a MASTER role and has wide open access to everything.
When they go into LID to do say a CTP install they are getting security violations. Here is the errors. What should I look for??
06/22/2016 15:09:54 appmetaload started productline: TRAIN reading d:/law/law/train/Admin/install.log for patches: PATCH111654.200 Patches found: PATCH111654.200 installed 06/22/2016 15:09:45 the following commands are being executed now metaloadsys -l TRAIN d:/law/law/train/Admin/sys.list Security Violation Load failed, metaloadsys command returned an error code of 1. metaloadelm -l TRAIN d:/law/law/train/Admin/elm.list Security Violation Load failed, metaloadelm command returned an error code of 1. metaloadtbl -l TRAIN d:/law/law/train/Admin/tbl.list Security Violation Load failed, metaloadtbl command returned an error code of 1. metaloadpgm -l TRAIN d:/law/law/train/Admin/pgm.list Security Violation Load failed, metaloadpgm command returned an error code of 1. metaloadwrk -l TRAIN d:/law/law/train/Admin/wrk.list Security Violation Load failed, metaloadwrk command returned an error code of 1. metaloadlib -l TRAIN d:/law/law/train/Admin/lib.list Security Violation Load failed, metaloadlib command returned an error code of 1. metaloadmnu -l TRAIN d:/law/law/train/Admin/mnu.list Security Violation Load failed, metaloadmnu command returned an error code of 1. metaloadskn -l TRAIN d:/law/law/train/Admin/skn.list Security Violation Load failed, metaloadskn command returned an error code of 1. metaloadmsg -l TRAIN d:/law/law/train/Admin/msg.list Security Violation Load failed, metaloadmsg command returned an error code of 1. ** Load errors occurred - review: d:/law/law/train/Admin/appmetaload.log ** 06/22/2016 15:09:56 appmetaload completed
If your installation is the similar to ours, we had the same issue. We had to go into TOKENDEF and add those tokens as valid tokens and then go to LS and assign them to the correct ENV security class.
when you say tokens which tokens are you speaking up? like all of them??
The tokens you are getting security violations on, for some reason it seems that not all tokens were automatically added for us. We actually had to manually add them, some of which are the same as you are also getting security violations on.
Most likely this error "The latest installation has not completed successfully" is the result of a previous dbreorg not finishing....