• Search Forums
    Advanced Search
Prev
Next
Forums Financial Management Lawson S3 Financials

AR575 vs AR580

 3 Replies
 2 Subscribed to this topic
 45 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Author
Messages
mikefortuna
New Member
Posts: 0
New Member
2/14/2020 5:39 PM
We have been using AR575 for a while, but the AR580 file format is much simpler. It seems that AR575 contains a lot of parameters in the input file, while AR580 uses a lot of these as job parameters. What are the differences, if any, in using AR580 for cash application vs AR575?
Tags: financials, lawson, ar575, ar580, AR, cash, cash application, payment
Todd Mitchell
Veteran Member
Posts: 87
Veteran Member
New Poster
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
2/14/2020 6:33 PM
We have used both, the main difference is the input tables used to process the payments.
mikefortuna
New Member
Posts: 0
New Member
2/14/2020 7:46 PM
I guess my question really centers around the results of the jobs. For example, cash code information is attached to the payment within the ARIPMT for AR575, but it is a parameter in AR580. When creating the payment batch, does AR580 know which payments to pull in from the ARIPAYMENT for the cash code entered in the job parameters?
Todd Mitchell
Veteran Member
Posts: 87
Veteran Member
New Poster
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
2/21/2020 4:09 PM
That is a very good question. The way we have used AR580 and AR575, it picks up anything in the interface table for the company code specified in the run time parameters. What I have seen is that the Process Level and/or cash code parameters are "overrides" to company defaults (AR01/AR00).