Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Human Capital Management
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Absence Management Accrual Tables
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Jeffin Joy
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
1
Overall:
4988
People Online:
Visitors:
225
Members:
0
Total:
225
Online Now:
New Topics
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1377
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Chris Martin
825
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Advanced Search
Prev
Next
Forums
Human Capital Management
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Absence Management Accrual Tables
Please
login
to post a reply.
1 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
69 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
SkaddenCourtney
Basic Member
Posts: 7
3/12/2012 6:32 PM
We are having the issue for employees reaching specific years of service and thus entitled to a higher accrual.
Example: Employee started on July 16, 2007 and by July 15, 2011, employee had already completed the 4 years of services. Starting from July 16, 2011 employee will be entitled to the increase. In 2012 employee entitled to the full increase 5 year accrual.
We have a quarterly accrual plan structure set up like the below based on hire date:
0-4 years - receive X amount of days
5-10 years - receive X amount of days
11+ years - receive X amount of days
All of my LP setsups refer to hire date as the eligible date. We accrue on 1/1, 4/1, 7/1 and 10/1. Our nearest point is set up as BEFORE requirements are met.
I have set up the accrual table as below:
From Cycle
Amount or Percent
0 "X" hours
20 "X" hours
40 "X" hours
Employees are still receiving their lower accrual for this year even though they are in the 5th year of hire. Is my table set up incorrectly? Help would be appreciated!! Thank you!
Ragu Raghavan
Veteran Member
Posts: 477
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
Engaged Poster
Wow, you're on a roll!
Avid Poster
Seriously, you're a posting maniac!
Engaged Reader
You are an engaged reader!
Avid Reader
Avid Reader art thou!
3/12/2012 11:37 PM
Split
If the accrual cycle is a quarter, 4 years = 16 cycles. So shouldn't step 2 say From Cycle 17 instead of 20, so the new rate will kick in on the 17th quarter (beginning of 5th year)?
Please
login
to post a reply.