Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
HR User Actions
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Lauren Beeker
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5222
People Online:
Visitors:
38
Members:
0
Total:
38
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson Portal
Need to limit available values in Manager Self-Service based on Action
4/16/2026 1:47 PM
Hello, Our managers have the ability in M
Lawson Portal
Lawson HR170 Jobs Index
3/30/2026 7:35 PM
Hi All, I am new in my role. The organization h
IPA/ProcessFlow
IPA Question - Filtering Employees by XRef Cost Center Across Person and HR Modules
3/2/2026 4:29 PM
Hello Everyone, I am building an IPA process in
Lawson S3 Financials
Lawson S3 to SAP S/4 Hana Migration
2/12/2026 8:54 PM
Can anyone recommend a consulting company who has
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
Missing Multi-Stream Upload Option
7/12/2023 11:09 PM
Our IS department has made the server configuratio
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Secure 2.0
12/8/2025 9:06 PM
Has anyone using S3 V10 for Benefits been able to
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
More.... ic81.2
12/5/2025 10:51 PM
We build our PAR's with MS Addins using IC81 and o
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
Deleting an Orphan Time Record with MS Add-ins
12/13/2025 7:26 PM
I have discovered an Orphan Time Record when dumpi
Lawson Landmark
Configuration Console - UserField
7/24/2019 6:05 PM
I have a userfield called "ContactCenter"&nb
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
Uploads
11/20/2025 3:32 AM
The Next button has stopped functioning on the upl
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1377
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Chris Martin
825
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Advanced Search
Prev
Next
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
HR User Actions
Please
login
to post a reply.
4 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
52 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
Jill
Basic Member
Posts: 7
11/11/2008 8:10 PM
I'm having trouble using "HR User Actions" to route ProcessFlow workunits to supervisors. The workunits never show up in the supervisor's in-basket. I'm not sure if my problem is in my ProcessFlow "HR User Action" node itself or the User/Task/Work Category set-up.
The regular "User Actions" work great. But -- since I want to use the employee/supervisor structure to route items -- I think I want to use the HR User Action node.
The recipient of my item is Company/New_Supervisor. On the PF Admin forms, I set-up a user where task is "MGR", Work Category = "Supervisor", and Work Category Value = "00014751" where the company=1 and sup code = 4751. (I've actually tried lots of different variations on recipient variables, tasks, and category values without luck)
Any idea what I'm missing?
Thanks,
Jill
David Williams
Veteran Member
Posts: 1127
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
11/11/2008 8:19 PM
Split
Check the Category Filter value on the WorkUnit to see what the system is defaulting to make sure the value is what you're expecting it to be.
Jill
Basic Member
Posts: 7
11/11/2008 8:47 PM
Split
Hello,
The category filter value for my workunit is what I would expect it to be. But, do HR User Actions use the category filter value? I know the regular User Action nodes use them. I *assumed* that the HR User Actions should go to recipients based on the variables chosen in ProcessFlow. (I can't find many examples on this stuff so I'm making a few guesses along the way!)
Thanks,
Jill
David Williams
Veteran Member
Posts: 1127
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
11/11/2008 9:11 PM
Split
Yes, the HR User Actions do use the Category Filter values. Can you send me screen shots of your WorkUnit and the User Category Definition you're using?
ConsultDavidW@gmail.com
Jill
Basic Member
Posts: 7
11/12/2008 7:22 PM
Split
Follow-up in case anyone else is interested...
Unlike "User Actions", "HR User Actions" don't use the Task/Filter/Work Category value set-up structure at all.
A HR User Action assigned to New_Supervisor does 2 things...1) finds the supervisor as assigned on HR11 and 2) looks in Security Administrator for a Resource Management ID assigned to that employee.
The first HR User Action called starts with the Category Value of the work unit (
). The next HR User Action called in the ProcessFlow automatically goes up the HR chain.
The items show up in the Inbasket under the "User Level Work" not the "Task Level Work".
In concept, it seems pretty slick. But as David pointed out, this won't work too well if there are gaps in our HR reporting structure.
Thanks for you help David!
Please
login
to post a reply.