Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
HRUSERACTION Node
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Jeffin Joy
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
4988
People Online:
Visitors:
32
Members:
0
Total:
32
Online Now:
New Topics
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1377
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Chris Martin
825
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Advanced Search
Prev
Next
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
HRUSERACTION Node
Please
login
to post a reply.
0 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
53 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
Shane Jones
Veteran Member
Posts: 460
3/11/2011 4:59 PM
We have a process that we use once a year. In the past we setup an USERACTION task for each supervisor within processflow and then had to maintain the information on the task assignments. When Lawson rolled out the HRUSERACTION we moved to that because it knows who the supervisors are automatically. The problem is this:
With the old task setups I could have one user see ALL items for the task and take actions if the supervisor did not act. With the new process of using the HRUSERACTION I am not able to find a way to make it so that one user can see everything within the inbasket. This means that I am managing these through the Process Flow Administrator tool. I have some thoughts on other ways to manage this but I wanted to know if anyone else has run into this and if you had any creative solutions... (I know that I can automatically take action after a specific number of days but I wanted to leave most in the supervisors in basket and only act on a few. - Also if we need to reject a bunch and can not get to the manager we have to do this through administrator whereas in the past the "assigned" user could see all of them in the inbasket and approve/reject without my involvment.)
Any thoughts you would like to share?
Please
login
to post a reply.