Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
PFlow access to multiple data areas in one environment
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
jmc
Past 24 Hours:
1
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5210
People Online:
Visitors:
390
Members:
0
Total:
390
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
Deleting an Orphan Time Record with MS Add-ins
12/13/2025 7:26 PM
I have discovered an Orphan Time Record when dumpi
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Secure 2.0
12/8/2025 9:06 PM
Has anyone using S3 V10 for Benefits been able to
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
More.... ic81.2
12/5/2025 10:51 PM
We build our PAR's with MS Addins using IC81 a
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
Uploads
11/20/2025 3:32 AM
The Next button has stopped functioning on the upl
S3 Systems Administration
Lawson Security Admin (LSA) - Securing Print Manager to self only
10/24/2025 6:27 PM
Looking for someone who would be willing to share
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
Lawson Add-in
9/30/2025 6:51 PM
I am looking for a Lawson Add-ins query to add new
Lawson S3 Procurement
Anyone getting PO 0000 not found for company error in PO23?
9/30/2025 2:45 AM
Anyone getting PO 0000 not found for company error
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
PO20 - Cancel PO via Add-in
9/25/2025 8:03 PM
Is it possible to cancel PO's using add-ins? I
S3 Systems Administration
S3 Payroll - PayStubs
9/18/2025 6:58 PM
Looking for a reliable solution to streamline the
S3 Systems Administration
Quick Access report
8/25/2025 7:17 PM
Looking for a good way to see who has access Lawso
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1377
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Chesca
1042
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
PFlow access to multiple data areas in one environment
Please
login
to post a reply.
4 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
52 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
Eric Haugen
Basic Member
Posts: 13
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
5/24/2010 1:29 PM
I have a question regarding PFlow. I have no experience with this product. I have an existing environment in which I wish to set up an additional data area. Let's call the environment TEST, the current data area TEST and the new data area to be added TEST2.
Is there a way to have specific PFlow users access the new data area TEST2, and default/assign other users to data area TEST? Kind of like how a Portal user may set preferences for data area? If so, how, and are there any ramifications I should be aware of?
If it cannot be overridden by user id, would PFlow transactions have to be cloned and renamed to point to the new TEST2 data area?
It seems like there should be a way to do this similar to how Portal operates. I see reference in the PFlow manual to something called LawsonAdapter that indicates a data area and user/password parameters.
Thanks.
Eric
David Williams
Veteran Member
Posts: 1127
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
5/24/2010 1:49 PM
Split
In LSF9 the Product Line/Data Area is passed to the flow through the Service so where it gets triggered from gets passed and you don't have to set this up by user.
Eric Haugen
Basic Member
Posts: 13
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
5/24/2010 2:49 PM
Split
When you say the data area is passed where is gets triggered from, does that mean for example that if a user is running PA52 in data area TEST2, that the data area TEST2 is passed?
JimY
Veteran Member
Posts: 510
5/24/2010 4:08 PM
Split
Yes. That is correct.
David Williams
Veteran Member
Posts: 1127
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
5/24/2010 4:23 PM
Split
Sorry, I was tied up in meeting. Jim is correct.
Please
login
to post a reply.