storedbrec - no key change + BSI errors

Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
nbrogdon
Basic Member
Posts: 11
Basic Member
    We are on LSF9.0.0.2 with 803 apps and TaxFactory 7.0k. Has anyone seen the errors we are getting on PA100?

    BEGIN: Job Submitted: Wed Jun 20 09:02:57 2007

    Step 1: PA100 Started. . . . . .: Wed Jun 20 09:02:57 2007
    Token Command. . . . . .: /lawson8/law/prod/obj/PA100.gnt
    Executable Command . . .: /lawson8/gen/bin/lacobrts lacobrts /lawson8/law/prod/obj/PA100.gnt prod jamonte PA100JJPRD 1
    Process ID . . . . . . .: 13712
    Program Messages:
    ** Creating .prt and .dtl files
    Processing PA100 (Action Update)
    File PROD/PAEMPLOYEE.
    tsStoreDBRec error is Key change not allowed (32).
    Wed Jun 20 09:03:05 2007: Tfxiface7:GetBsiFunction7(): child process failure on first pipe read

    Elapsed Time . . . . . .: 00:00:08

    ERROR: Stopped On Exit 1.


    Any help/ideas/suggestions are greatly appreciated!

    Nicole Brogdon
    John Henley
    Senior Member
    Posts: 3348
    Senior Member
      Do you have any custom indexes on PAEMPLOYEE?
      What platform / database are you running?
      Have you experienced any other TXF-related errors? Or has this been working correctly before, and this is the first error?
      Thanks for using the LawsonGuru.com forums!
      John
      nbrogdon
      Basic Member
      Posts: 11
      Basic Member
        Hi John -

        We are running on HP-UX with an Oracle 10g database.

        This is one of the main errors we are experiencing. We recently migrated to the LSF9 environment, and have been receiving these errors since doing so.

        We have 2 custom indices on the table.
        *One is company, locat_code, employee and it is a unique constraint.
        *The other is company, maiden_lst_nm, employee and it is also a unique constraint.
        John Henley
        Senior Member
        Posts: 3348
        Senior Member
          Make sure that you have the 'Key Change' option set to YES in dbdef for these custom indexes.
          Thanks for using the LawsonGuru.com forums!
          John
          nbrogdon
          Basic Member
          Posts: 11
          Basic Member
            I am actually testing that now!

            Thanks a ton for your response :-)

            Nicole

            PS - I'll post my testing outcome in a few ;-)
            nbrogdon
            Basic Member
            Posts: 11
            Basic Member
              John - you are my hero! Our programs are no longer getting that hokey error!

              Thank you so very, very much!
              -Nicole
              You are not authorized to post a reply.