Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Enterprise Resource Planning & Manufacturing
Lawson S3 Procurement
Limiting Requestors to one company
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Chris Radcliffe
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5187
People Online:
Visitors:
242
Members:
0
Total:
242
Online Now:
New Topics
S3 Customization/Development
Cobol - Extract Current Time
4/24/2024 7:21 PM
How do you extract just the Current System Time in
Lawson Landmark
LPL INSTR Functions
4/5/2024 8:32 PM
I'm writing a simple report using the Create R
Infor SCM
Translating 856 to get the ~ REF^CN^ field
4/3/2024 8:24 PM
We are trying to get the tracking number which is
IPA/ProcessFlow
Sample XML file create Flow
4/3/2024 3:43 PM
Hello everyone, I am new to creating XML files
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
bn105 error message
3/26/2024 6:40 PM
I need to change some of the set ups in our Life I
IPA/ProcessFlow
IPA executing Job
3/13/2024 7:08 PM
New to the IPA world and was wondering, can an IPA
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Life Age Reduction on benefits plans
3/12/2024 7:15 PM
For our optional life we have an age based coverag
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
BN53.1 Add-In
3/7/2024 3:31 PM
We are migrating to Solstice. They require a
Lawson Business Intelligence/Reporting/Crystal
Domain Name Change
3/5/2024 7:45 PM
Our domain name needs to change and was hoping I c
S3 Customization/Development
Cobol calling Shell Script
2/29/2024 1:27 PM
Has anyone created or modified a Lawson Cobol prog
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3288
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1351
Roger French
1311
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Unanswered
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Lawson S3 Procurement
Limiting Requestors to one company
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
Display Name
Basic Member
Posts: 17
9/7/2012 4:34 PM
We added a second company to AP, GL, PO, IC, RQ. In adding the second company to RQ, requestors can now select accounting unit/accounts for both companies. How are people limiting requestors to a single company. Is there a way in RQ or do we use the GL system restrictions?
John Henley
Senior Member
Posts: 3348
9/7/2012 5:02 PM
I typically do this by combining accounting units on RQ04 with security rules against GLNAMES; it does fall apart when you have additional companies, since you then have to leave the company field blank on RQ04. With multiple companies, it's a problem writing rules if your accounting units have same number/key across multiple companies. I don't think there is a good solution.
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1162
9/10/2012 7:07 PM
At least for RQC you can modify the rqc_config.xml file to
For those who can access RQ10 would need the security rules. Maybe you could create a rule that only allows a specific value in the company field in RQ10?
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1162
9/10/2012 7:10 PM
Not sure why my entire message was not posted but here is the setting for the rqc_config.xml file
setting id="allow_company_select" value="true"
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1162
9/10/2012 7:11 PM
sorry. that should be
setting id="allow_company_select" value="false"
Display Name
Basic Member
Posts: 17
9/12/2012 1:08 PM
Thanks.
We found an existing enhancement request that has been elevated to development so should have a resolution in the next iteration.
They didn't want to open up RQ10 again.
We're adding our intercompany transfer accounting unit (which doesn't allow ordering) from the new company to old requestors' profile and old company's I/C AU to the new company's requestors to accomodate the 'security by exception' rules in RQC.
Now if only the RQ204 report would show all instead of last modified...
You are not authorized to post a reply.