Who's On?

	Membership:
	Latest: chaoticist
	Past 24 Hours: 2
	Prev. 24 Hours: 0
	Overall: 5185

	People Online:
	Visitors: 169
	Members: 0
	Total: 169

Name	Points
Greg Moeller	4184
David Williams	3349
JonA	3288
Kat V	2984
Woozy	1973
Jimmy Chiu	1883
Kwane McNeal	1437
Ragu Raghavan	1348
Roger French	1311
mark.cook	1244

LAUA in 9.0

Sort:

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author

Messages

andrew5499

Veteran Member

Posts: 100

8/29/2007 5:41 PM

We are testing out 9.0. I know you can still use LAUA security in 9.0; but

1.how do you turn it on ?
2. add new users in 9 so we can use exisiting laua security classes.

We normally in 8 we added new user to lawson local group on server, then user showed up in laua.

John Henley

Senior Member

Posts: 3348

8/29/2007 5:47 PM

When you add a new user in Lawson Security, the CheckLS flag is set to NO for LAUA security, YES for new Lawson Security. Make sure you add them to a Lawson user group via usergrpdef (Lawson group) in addition to adding them to the Lawson Local Group (Windows group). That, in addition to putting them in Lawson Security/RM should make them show up in LAUA...

andrew5499

Veteran Member

Posts: 100

8/29/2007 6:20 PM

thanks for the reply.

So you still need the local lawson group on the server ?

All I got out of the class, was setting the CheckLS to no (for laua security),

to review
1. still need local Lawson group
2. add to group

we had consultant do upgrade for us, I can see all users in laua - but he did not re-create the Lawson group on the server. When we turned security on in LAUA - I could not do anything.

John Henley

Senior Member

Posts: 3348

8/31/2007 12:59 AM

Yes, you still need the user in the local Lawson (windows) Group if they are a LID user and/or run batch jobs.

andrew5499

Veteran Member

Posts: 100

8/31/2007 11:25 AM

AS always, thank you for your prompt response.

I will test out this weekend.

You are not authorized to post a reply.