Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Infor / Lawson Platforms
S3 Security
Lawson 9.0 Personnel Action Rule
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Mark
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5192
People Online:
Visitors:
370
Members:
0
Total:
370
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
S3 Customization/Development
Read and Write CSV file COBOL
10/9/2024 2:53 PM
Does anyone have a quik example of a program that
Infor CloudSuite
Infor OS/Cloudsuite SCIM groups
10/4/2024 2:06 PM
We are in the process of moving to the Cloudsuite
Lawson Landmark
Spreadsheet Designer Error "Unknown state selection"
9/20/2024 3:19 PM
I am looking for assistance, I am trying to upload
Lawson S3 Procurement
Adding Std Comments to all PO's
9/17/2024 7:06 PM
Does anyone know of a way to get trailing comments
Lawson S3 Procurement
Missing po info
9/4/2024 3:34 PM
We are experiencing an issue where freight account
Lawson S3 Procurement
We need to charge multiple items to 1 dept no mattter who orders the items. Our POs are out of company 1000 and cost centers are set up in company 1300. Does anyone else have this issue and have a way around it?
8/16/2024 1:55 PM
We have 3 items that need to be charged to the lab
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1366
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Infor / Lawson Platforms
S3 Security
Lawson 9.0 Personnel Action Rule
Please
login
to post a reply.
3 Replies
1
Subscribed to this topic
90 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
psherry
Basic Member
Posts: 6
5/1/2007 4:03 PM
I have been trying to build a rule in LSF 9.0 security where if a certain personal action is choosen it would only show certain reason codes. I have tried to build this rule on the PCODES table with no luck. Has anyone come across a rule for this on PA52.
Thanks!
awolff01
Basic Member
Posts: 8
5/2/2007 5:39 PM
Hi Paul. It sounds like your trying to secure the select drop-down "Reasons" correct? Well you'll need to create a rule on the Element 'code' (and perhaps 'type') as defined in dbdef PCODES table.
My question is what is the business rule that defines which reason codes are should be visible based on the action code chosen?
Anyway..securing elements is tricky..I've done it successfully once before and it was a lot of trial and error.
Good luck.
John Henley
Posts: 3353
5/3/2007 1:35 AM
Paul, I have to second Alex's opinion, in that I'm not a big fan of coding business rules into Security. In fact, my opinion is that Lawson probably made a mistake in opening up security too much. I think what happened is that it was SO limited in LAUA that they got really tired of hearing about it. Consequently, they essentially said, "OK clients, you said you wanted more control over security--here it is--go configure it!" and decided to open EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING for security rules. It's just a disaster waiting to happen, as clients start coding logic / rules into the security.
Think about that for a second...what happens a year or two from now, when nothing's documented and everyone's gone (hopefully I'm exaggerating a little!)?
My ideal way of handling what you're asking for is to code the business rule via a user exit (where it properly belongs, in my view) based on perhaps a custom table of valid combinations.
psherry
Basic Member
Posts: 6
5/3/2007 12:00 PM
Thank you Both!!!
Please
login
to post a reply.